Comparative Efficacy of Different Trichoderma Species in Suppressing Soil-Borne Pathogens of Major Food Crops

Authors

  • Bharat Bhooshan Department of Botany, Rameshwari Devi Government Girls College, Bharatpur Affiliated to Maharaja Surajmal Brij University, Bharatpur Rajasthan, India
  • Devesh Kumar Department of Botany, Raja Balwant Singh (RBS) College, Agra, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.372.2583-2093

Keywords:

T. harzianum, T. viride, T. asperellum, and T. atroviride

Abstract

Soil-borne pathogens cause severe yield losses in many economically important crops. In the search for sustainable and eco-friendly plant protection strategies, Trichoderma species have emerged as prominent biocontrol agents. This review compares the efficacy of various Trichoderma species, including T. harzianum, T. viride, T. asperellum, and T. atroviride, against major soil-borne pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria brassicae, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium sclerotium, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Pythium spp. The review looks at antagonism mechanisms like mycoparasitism, antibiosis, enzyme production, and induced systemic resistance. It also investigates the role of species-specific characteristics in pathogen suppression, focusing on host specificity, rhizosphere competence, and environmental adaptability. Field trial data and laboratory studies are combined to determine the comparative effectiveness and applicability of these biocontrol agents.

References

Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.

Benitez, T., Rincon, A. M., Limón, M. C., & Codon, A. C. (2004). Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. International Microbiology, 7(4), 249–260.

Bhooshan, B., & Kumar, D. (2022). Survey, isolation and cultural characterization of Alternaria brassicae (Berk.) Sacc. from the naturally infected fields of cauliflower in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Science Innovations and Nature of Earth (JSIANE), 2(4), 7–14.

Bhooshan, B., & Kumar, D. (2023). Induction of systemic resistance by biotic and abiotic compounds against Alternaria blight of cauliflower caused by Alternaria brassicae. Journal of Science Innovations and Nature of Earth, 3(3), 33–36.

Bhooshan, B., & Kumar, D. (2024). Study of the defence response in cauliflower against Alternaria brassicae by using biotic and abiotic compounds. Indian Journal of Applied & Pure Biology, 39(2), 1183–1198.

Gardiner, D. M., Waring, P., & Howlett, B. J. (2004). The epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) class of fungal toxins: Distribution, mode of action, functions and biosynthesis. Microbiology, 151(4), 1021–1032.

Ghosh, S., Mandal, N. C., & Das, S. (2022). Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. and their role in plant health management. Archives of Microbiology, 204(9), 564.

Grigoletto, D. F., de Almeida, M. A., de Melo, I. S., & Kuramae, E. E. (2023). Peptaibols and their multifunctional role in plant–fungal interactions: Recent advances and biotechnological potential. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1187034.

Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004). Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2(1), 43–56.

Hermosa, R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Monte, E. (2012). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology, 158(1), 17–25.

Howell, C. R. (2003). Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Disease, 87(1), 4–10.

Jogaiah, S., Abdelrahman, M., Tran, L.-S. P., & Shin, D. H. (2023). Biological control agents and plant immunity: Understanding trends and challenges in the era of climate change. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 202, 107712.

Kumar, D. (2020). Plant immune response strategies against pathogens. Plant Archives, 20(1), 1169–1174.

Kumar, S., Yadav, B. D., Yadav, M., & Singh, A. (2021). Exploring the role of Trichoderma spp. in agriculture: A biotechnological perspective. Journal of Fungi, 7(8), 599.

Liu, T., Li, L., Zhang, Y., & Yang, W. (2022). Synergistic effects of Trichoderma spp. in synthetic microbial consortia for biocontrol and plant growth promotion. Microbial Cell Factories, 21(1), 234.

Lorito, M., Woo, S. L., Harman, G. E., & Monte, E. (2010). Translational research on Trichoderma: From 'omics to the field. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 395–417.

Manganiello, G., Salerno, M., Lombardi, N., Carletti, P., Concutelli, F., & Woo, S. L. (2018). Root colonization by Trichoderma harzianum primes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plant defense against biotic stress. Applied Soil Ecology, 124, 279–289.

Mukherjee, P. K., Horwitz, B. A., Herrera-Estrella, A., Schmoll, M., & Kenerley, C. M. (2013). Trichoderma research in the genome era. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 51, 105–129.

Mukherjee, P. K., Horwitz, B. A., Singh, U. S., Mukherjee, M., & Schmoll, M. (2022). Trichoderma in agriculture: Emerging trends and future prospects. Fungal Biology Reviews, 40, 1–20.

Pandey, A., Palni, L. M. S., & Trivedi, P. (2022). Environmental adaptability of Trichoderma spp. and their application in diverse soil types. Journal of Soil Biology and Ecology, 42(1), 33–42.

Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2021). Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 59, 347–375.

Poveda, J. (2021). Trichoderma as biocontrol agent against soil-borne fungal pathogens: A review. Agronomy, 11(4), 823.

Rathi, A. S., Kolte, S. J., & Awasthi, R. P. (2014). Epidemiological studies and management of Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) in Indian mustard. Journal of Oilseed Brassica, 5(1), 33–37.

Sharma, P., & Singh, H. B. (2014). Biocontrol of fungal diseases in plants by Trichoderma species. In H. B. Singh & C. S. Nautiyal (Eds.), Microbial biotechnology: Energy and environment (pp. 113–128). Springer.

Shoresh, M., Harman, G. E., & Mastouri, F. (2010). Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 21–43.

Singh, A., Prakash, S., & Yadav, R. (2023). Advances in understanding of Trichoderma-mediated induced systemic resistance in plants: A holistic approach for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Plant Interactions, 18(1), 112–127.

Singh, R., Sharma, P., & Thakur, M. (2016). Field evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum for control of Fusarium wilt in tomato and chickpea. Indian Phytopathology, 69(4), 385–390.

Singh, R., Devi, S., & Rajawat, M. (2023). Bioactive metabolites from Trichoderma spp. and their potential role in plant disease control and growth promotion: A review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 134(6), lxad129.

Singh, S., Singh, R. K., & Pandey, R. R. (2016). Comparative efficacy of different Trichoderma spp. against Fusarium oxysporum causing wilt in tomato. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 26(3), 321–331.

Shoresh, M., Harman, G. E., & Mastouri, F. (2010). Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 21–43.

Sood, M., Kapoor, D., Kumar, V., Sheteiwy, M. S., & Ramakrishnan, M. (2020). Trichoderma: The "secrets" of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants, 9(6), 762.

Verma, M., Brar, S. K., Tyagi, R. D., Surampalli, R. Y., & Valero, J. R. (2017). Antagonistic fungi Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 136, 122–139.

Verma, M., Yadav, J., & Sagar, R. (2017). Efficacy of Trichoderma asperellum against Pythium spp. in rice seedlings under nursery conditions. Journal of Biological Control, 31(1), 12–18.

Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Woo, S. L., & Lorito, M. (2008). Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(1), 1–10.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

How to Cite

Comparative Efficacy of Different Trichoderma Species in Suppressing Soil-Borne Pathogens of Major Food Crops. (2025). Journal of Science Innovations and Nature of Earth, 5(2), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.372.2583-2093