PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODE (PPNS) INVESTIGATION IN SELECTED SITE OF LOWER HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND, INDIA

Authors

  • Aashana Department of Zoology, RG (PG) College, Meerut
  • Garima Pundir Department of Zoology, RG (PG) College, Meerut
  • Kajol Yadav Department of Zoology, RG (PG) College, Meerut
  • Ashok Kumar Chaubey Department of Zoology, Chaudhary Chara Singh University, Meerut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59436/yqzng189

Keywords:

biodiversity indices, climatic parameters, Pauri Garhwal

Abstract

These findings can be valuable tools for long-term monitoring and for comprehending regional soil. Nematodes are essential components of soil the soil community capable of surviving extreme and diverse climatic conditions. The diversity and distribution of soil nematodes were studied from the agricultural crop from the selected localities of Pauri Garhwal (1,814 mASL, 29.18ºC to 14.26ºC), A total of 110 soil samples were collected attitudinally from subarea of Pauri Gharwal. The present study revealed that the nematode diversity consist of 54 genera. The nematode diversity structure also demonstrated sensitivity to various other climatic parameters. Elevation significantly influenced biodiversity indices, diversity composition, and trophic levels. Nematode genera richness and all regular indexes indicated lower biodiversity of soil nematodes at higher altitudes. These findings can be valuable tools for long-term monitoring and for comprehending regional soil health in the face of changing environmental conditions.

References

Anderson JM (1975). The enigma of soil animal species diversity. In: Progress in soil zoology, Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Soil Zoology 1973. pp. 51–8.

Bongers T (1990). The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83:14–19.

Bongers T & Bongers M (1998). Functional diversity of nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology. 10:239–251.

Ferris H, Bongers T and De Goede R (2001). A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology. 18:13–29.

Giller P S (1996). The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man's tropical rainforest’. Biodiversity and Conservation. 5:135–168. doi.org/10.1007/BF00055827

Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean. L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with NaHCO3, USDA Cir.939. U.S. Washington.

Viglierchio DR & Schmitt RV (1983). On the methodology of nematode extraction from field samples: Baermann funnel modifications. Journal of Nematology. 15:438–444.

Hausenbuiller RL (1976). Soil science, Principles and practices, Washington state University, Pullman, 247.

Heip C, Herman PMJ &Soetaert K (1988). Data Processing, Evaluation and Analysis. In : R Higgins an H. Thiel (eds): An Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna. Smithsoni-an Press. pp.197–231.

Usher MB, Davis P, Harris J & Longstaff B (1979). A profusion of species? Approaches towards understanding the dynamics of the populations of microarthropods in decomposer communities. In. Population Dynamics (R.M. Anderson, B.D. Turner and L.R. Taylor, eds) Oxford. Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 359–84.

Yeates GW, Bongers T, de Goede RGM, Freckman DW & Georgieva SS (1993). Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. Journal of Nematology. 25:315–331.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODE (PPNS) INVESTIGATION IN SELECTED SITE OF LOWER HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND, INDIA. (2024). Journal of Science Innovations and Nature of Earth, 4(2), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.59436/yqzng189

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.