Role of WTO in the India–America Trade War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.v6i1.12.2583-2093Keywords:
World Trade Organization (WTO), India–U.S. Trade Relations, Trade Disputes, Tariff Measures, Export Subsidies, Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Global Trade GovernanceAbstract
The growing interdependence of global economies has intensified trade relations as well as trade conflicts among major nations. The bilateral trade relationship between India and United States represents a significant component of the global trading system, characterized by both cooperation and periodic disputes. This study examines the role of the World Trade Organization in managing trade tensions between the two countries, often described as a “trade war” in a limited and episodic sense. The research adopts a qualitative and analytical approach based on secondary data sources, including WTO reports, policy documents, and trade statistics. The study focuses on four key parameters: tariff measures, export subsidy intensity, trade dispute frequency, and trade volume impact. The findings reveal that tariff escalations and export subsidies have been major sources of conflict, leading to multiple disputes under the WTO framework, particularly during the 2018–2020 period. The WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism has played a crucial role in providing a legal platform for resolving these conflicts, thereby preventing uncontrolled escalation and encouraging negotiated settlements. However, the study also highlights limitations in the WTO’s effectiveness, especially due to the Appellate Body crisis, which has weakened the enforcement of decisions. Despite recurring disputes, bilateral trade between India and the United States has shown long-term growth, indicating strong economic interdependence. Overall, the WTO acts as a moderating institution that stabilizes trade relations by promoting rule-based governance. The study concludes that strengthening WTO mechanisms and adapting them to contemporary trade challenges are essential for ensuring sustainable and balanced global trade relations.
References
Bown, C. P. (2022). US–China trade war tariffs: An up-to-date chart. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com
Bown, C. P., & Irwin, D. A. (2022). The GATT’s starting point: Tariff levels circa 1947. Journal of International Economics, 138, 103651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103651
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2023). Global trade alert report 2023: Trade policy responses. CEPR Press.
Hoekman, B., & Kostecki, M. (2009). The political economy of the world trading system (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hoekman, B., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2021). Preventing the bad from getting worse: The end of the WTO dispute settlement system? European Journal of International Law, 32(2), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab037
Irwin, D. A. (2023). The rise and fall of US trade policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.163
Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). (2025). 2025 trade policy agenda and annual report. https://ustr.gov
Wolfe, R. (2022). Reforming WTO dispute settlement: Why and how? World Trade Review, 21(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474562100047X
World Trade Organization. (2023). Understanding the WTO (6th ed.). WTO Publications.
World Trade Organization. (2024). Dispute settlement activity report. https://www.wto.org
World Trade Organization. (2024). Dispute settlement: The disputes process. https://www.wto.org
World Trade Organization. (2024). World trade statistical review 2024. https://www.wto.org
World Trade Organization. (2024). World trade statistical review 2024. WTO Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maharaj Singh Educational Research Development Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



