A Review of Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Aedes aegypti in Uttar Pradesh

Authors

  • Shireen Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vishan Kumar Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anil Kumar Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Gauravi Yadav Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Neelam Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Hridayesh Arya Department of Zoology, N.R.E.C. College, Khurja, Bulandshahr. Affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.v6i1.15.2583-2093

Keywords:

Aedes aegypti Spatio-temporal distribution Uttar Pradesh Dengue vector Vector ecology Seasonal variation Urbanization

Abstract

The mosquito Aedes aegypti is a principal vector responsible for the transmission of major arboviral diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, posing a serious public health challenge in India. The present review aims to synthesize existing knowledge on the spatio-temporal distribution of Aedes aegypti in Uttar Pradesh, one of the most densely populated states with recurring outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases. The analysis of available literature indicates that the distribution of Aedes aegypti is highly heterogeneous across the state and is strongly influenced by environmental, climatic, and anthropogenic factors. Urban and peri-urban regions, including cities such as Lucknow, Kanpur, and Varanasi, have been identified as major hotspots due to high population density, inadequate waste management, and the presence of numerous artificial breeding habitats. Spatial distribution patterns reveal that districts with rapid urbanization and poor sanitation infrastructure exhibit higher entomological indices, including House Index (HI), Container Index (CI), and Breteau Index (BI), indicating an elevated risk of dengue transmission. Temporal analysis demonstrates a strong seasonal trend, with peak mosquito densities occurring during the monsoon and post-monsoon periods, primarily due to increased rainfall and optimal temperature conditions that favor breeding and survival. In contrast, population density declines during extreme summer and winter conditions. Furthermore, climate change is expected to influence the expansion of mosquito distribution and prolong the transmission season, thereby increasing disease risk. The review highlights the importance of integrated vector management strategies, including environmental control, community participation, and the application of modern tools such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for surveillance and risk mapping. Strengthening vector monitoring systems and promoting public awareness are essential for effective control of mosquito populations. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and researchers to develop targeted interventions aimed at reducing the burden of vector-borne diseases in Uttar Pradesh.

References

Achee, N. L., Gould, F., Perkins, T. A., Reiner, R. C., Morrison, A. C., Ritchie, S. A., … Scott, T. W. (2015). A critical assessment of vector control for dengue prevention. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9(5), e0003655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655

Bale, J. S., Masters, G. J., Hodkinson, I. D., Awmack, C., Bezemer, T. M., Brown, V. K., … Whittaker, J. B. (2002). Herbivory in global climate change research. Global Change Biology, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x

Brady, O. J., Golding, N., Pigott, D. M., Kraemer, M. U., Messina, J. P., Reiner, R. C., … Hay, S. I. (2013). Global temperature constraints on Aedes aegypti persistence. Parasites & Vectors, 6, 338. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-338

Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aedes aegypti (L.) the yellow fever mosquito. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511522583

Dhimal, M., Ahrens, B., & Kuch, U. (2015). Climate change and spatio-temporal distribution of dengue. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 4, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-015-0055-2

Eisen, L., & Moore, C. G. (2013). Aedes aegypti in the Americas. Journal of Medical Entomology, 50(5), 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME13073

Gubler, D. J. (2011). Dengue, urbanization and globalization. Tropical Medicine and Health, 39(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.2149/tmh.2011-S05

Hoffmann, A. A., Montgomery, B. L., Popovici, J., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Johnson, P. H., Muzzi, F., … O’Neill, S. L. (2011). Wolbachia reduces dengue transmission. Nature, 476, 454–457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10356

IPCC. (2014). Climate change impacts report. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415379

Kraemer, M. U. G., Sinka, M. E., Duda, K. A., Mylne, A. Q., Shearer, F. M., Barker, C. M., … Hay, S. I. (2015). Global distribution of Aedes aegypti. eLife, 4, e08347. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08347

Kumar, P., Singh, R., & Singh, V. (2018). Distribution of dengue vector in North India. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 55(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9062.242568

Lacey, L. A. (2007). Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 23(sp2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[133:BTT]2.0.CO;2

Messina, J. P., Brady, O. J., Golding, N., Kraemer, M. U., Wint, G. R., Ray, S. E., … Hay, S. I. (2019). Future global distribution of Aedes aegypti. Nature Microbiology, 4, 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0376-y

Morin, C. W., Comrie, A. C., & Ernst, K. (2013). Climate and dengue transmission. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(11–12), 1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306556

NVBDCP. (2020). Dengue situation in India. Government of India.

Ranson, H., N’Guessan, R., Lines, J., Moiroux, N., Nkuni, Z., & Corbel, V. (2010). Insecticide resistance in vectors. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 10(10), 734–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70134-6

Ryan, S. J., Carlson, C. J., Mordecai, E. A., & Johnson, L. R. (2019). Global expansion of Aedes-borne viruses. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(3), e0007213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213

Shepard, D. S., Undurraga, E. A., & Halasa, Y. A. (2016). Economic burden of dengue. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(2), e0004296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004296

Tiwari, S., Singh, R. K., & Tiwari, S. (2017). Seasonal variation of dengue vector. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 54(4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9062.225845

World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Dengue guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029650

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Volume 6 Issue 1 (March) 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Maharaj Singh Educational Research Development Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

A Review of Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Aedes aegypti in Uttar Pradesh. (2026). Journal of Science Innovations and Nature of Earth, 6(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.v6i1.15.2583-2093

Similar Articles

81-90 of 217

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>