A Review on Geographical distribution of Aedes mosquito species in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59436/jsiane.426.2583-2093Keywords:
Arboviral diseases, bioclimate, entropy modelling, systematic monitoring, implementation, geographic distribution, epidemic remote sensing,Abstract
The majority of arboviral infections in the modern age are transmitted by the Aedes mosquito, the most common mosquito genus. Changes in precipitation and temperature are driving the fast spread of breeding grounds for Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, which is a big health risk on a global scale. Using bioclimatic characteristics, this review study projected the geographical expansion of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in India. The goal of collecting 19 bioclimatic variables and 583 Aedes occurrences' reference coordinates at a scale of about 1 km was to train Species Distribution Models (SDMs) for every species.The basic distributions of climatic niches for the species were predicted using maximum entropy modelling.Global climate models for 2021–2040 and 2081-2100 were used independently to estimate future events. The models have a respectable level of performance (AUC > 0.77).Higher annual mean temperatures and lower diurnal temperatures were ideal for both species, and their suitability increased with precipitation. Compared to Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti was expected to have a wider range in the present and the future. Diseases caused by these viruses include yellow fever, dengue fever, chikungunya, Zika, and Mayaro. Dengue and chikungunya are believed to be transmitted in India by mosquitoes of the Aedes species. Dengue fever and chikungunya are two of the country's most serious public health issues. Dengue fever has plagued southern Indian states since 1991, posing a public health concern and hardship for those afflicted. The 2006 chikungunya epidemic was worst in southern India. Dengue fever was reported in 24 of India's 34 states and 3 union territories in 2017. Among these states, the most cases were found: Bengal, Punjab, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala are the states in question. The four serotypes of dengue virus—DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4—are distributed throughout the nation, however their prevalence varies with the passage of time and geographical regions. The dengue and chikungunya vector mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, need to have their geographic distribution and seasonal variation recorded so that systematic surveillance, organisation, and implementation may be carried out. Consequently, the Public health officials may be able to prevent a dengue epidemic by monitoring the countries and state's endemic situation. An optimal strategy for dengue surveillance across the country and in endemic areas could involve mapping the seasonal fluctuation and spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus with the use of remote sensing and GIS technologies. This will make it easier for public health professionals to manage the epidemiological situation in the regions of the country where dengue is prevalent, as well as to plan, execute, and choose an appropriate control strategy for the preventative measures.
References
Lwande, O.W., Obanda, V., Lindstr¨om, A., Ahlm, C., Evander, M.,N¨aslund, J.,Bucht, G., 2020. Globe- trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: riskfactors for arbovirus pandemics. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 20, 71–81.https://doi.org/10.1089/ vbz.2019.2486.Larchmt. N.
Kraemer, M.U.G., Sinka, M.E., Duda, K.A., Mylne, A., Shearer, F.M., Brady, O.J.,Messina, J.P., Barker, C.M., Moore, C.G., Carvalho, R.G., Coelho, G.E., Van Bortel, W., Hendrickx, G., Schaffner, F., Wint,G.R.W.,Elyazar, I.R.F., Teng, H.J., Hay, S.I.,2015a. The global compendium of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus occurrence. Sci.Data 2, 150035. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.35.
Santos, J., Meneses, B.M., 2017. An integrated approach for the assessment of theAedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus global spatial distribution, and determ ination of the zones susceptible to the development of Zika virus. Acta Trop. 168, 80–90.https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.01.015.
Shragai, T., Tesla, B., Murdock, C., Harrington, L.C., 2017. Zika and chikungunya:mosquito-borne viruses in a changing world. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1399, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13306.
Sharif, N., Sarkar, M.K., Ferdous, R.N., Ahmed, S.N.,Billah, Md.B., Talukder, A.A.,Zhang, M., Dey, S.K.,2021. Molecular epidemiology, evolution and reemergence of chikungunya virus in South Asia. Front. Microbiol. 12, 689979 https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fmicb.2021.689979.
Campbell, L.P., Luther, C., Moo-Llanes, D., Ramsey, J.M., Danis-Lozano, R.,Peterson, A. T., 2015. Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140135 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0135.
Tyagi BK, Hiriyan J, Samuel P Philip, Tewari SC, Paramasivan R.Dengue in Kerala: A critical review. ICMR Bull 2006; 36 (4-5):13-22.
Tyagi BK, and Dash AP. Dengue in India with special reference to the Inter specific invasive and virus transmission potential of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in Kerala: An update. Vector Biology,2006; 142-58.
Tyagi BK, Hiriyan J, Tewari SC. Dengue in India: A review with special emphasis on climate and environment variabilities.Presented in Ist International Seminar on Medical Entomology, 2003; 33: 19-20.
M.Palaniyandi. The environmental aspects of dengue and chikungunya outbreaks in India: GIS for epidemic control,International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2014; 1(2): 35-40.
M.Palaniyandi. Socio-economic and environmental determinants of dengue and chikungunya transmission: GIS for surveillance and epidemic control - a systematic review, 2019, International Journal of ScientificResearch, 8(2): 4-9.
Babita Bisht, Roop Kumari, BN Nagpal, Himmat Singh,Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, AK Bansal and NR Tuli. Influence of environmental factors on dengue fever in Delhi.International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2019; 6(2): 11-18.
M Palaniyandi, PH Anand and T Pavendar. Environmental risk factors in relation to occurrence of vector borne disease epidemics:Remote sensing and GIS for rapid assessment, picturesque, and monitoring towards sustainable health, International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2017; 4(3): 09-20.
Beserra EB, Fernandes CRM, Silva SAO, Silva LA, Santos JW. Effects of temperature on life cycle, thermal exigency and number of generations per year estimation of Aedes aegypt (Diptera,Culicidae). Iheringia-Serie Zoologia 2009; 99:142-148. (Portuguese with English abstract).
Hales S, de Wet N, Maindonald J, Woodward A. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. Lancet.2002; 360: 830-834.
Dom NC, Ahmad AH, Latif ZA, Ismail R. Application of geographical information system- based analytical hierarchy process as a tool for dengue risk assessment. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2016; 6(12): 928-935.
Franklin J. Mapping species distributions: Spatial inference and prediction.Cambridge: University Press; 2009. 320 p.
Hopp MJ, and Foley JA. Global-scale relationships between climate and the dengue fever vector, Aedes aegypti. Climate Change, 2001; 48: 441-463.
Selvan PS, Jebanesan A. Studies on potential breeding habitats of dengue and chikungunya vector mosquitoes in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India.Indian, Journal of N atural Products and Resources. 2016; 7(3): 234-239.
Selvan SP, Jebanesan A, Reetha D. Entomofauna diversity of tree hole mosquitoes I n Western and Eastern Ghats hill ranges of Tamil Nadu, India. Acta Tropica.2016; 159: 69-82.
M.Palaniyandi. GIS based community survey and systematic grid sampling for dengue epidemic surveillance, control, and management: a case study of Pondicherry Municipality, Int.Journal of Mosquito Research, 2014, 1 (4): 72-80.
National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi,2019.
Spatial cognition: a geospatial analysis of vector borne disease transmission and the environment, using remote sensing and GIS”,Int. Journal of Mosquito Research, 2014, 1 (3), 39-54.
Srinivasa Rao Mutheneni, Andrew P Morse, Cyril Caminade, and Suryanaryana Murty Upadhyayula, Dengue burden in India: recent trends and importance of climatic parameters., Emerging Microbes & Infections (2017) 6, e70.
Kolivras KN. Changes in dengue risk potential in Hawaii, USA,due to climate variability and change. Climate Research, 2010; 42:1-11.
Hopp MJ, and Foley JA. Global-scale relationships between climate and the dengue fever vector, Aedes aegypti. Climate Change 2001; 48: 441-463.
TW Kesetyaningsih, Sri Andarini, Sudarto, and Henny Pramoedyo.Determination of environmental factors affecting dengue incidence in Selman district, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, African Journal of Infectious Diseases (AJID).2018; 12(1 Suppl): 13-25.
M.Palaniyandi. Remote Sensing and GIS for Mapping the Geographical Distribution and Ecological aspects of vector borne diseases in India, GIS India, January 2013, 4-7.
Thammapalo S, Chongsywiwatwong V, Geater A, Lim A,Choomale K. Sociodemographic and environmental factors associated with Aedes breeding places in Phuket, Thailand.Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health.2005; 36:426-433
Selvan PS, Jebanesan A. Studies on potential breeding habitats of dengue and chikungunya vector mosquitoes in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian, Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2016; 7(3): 234-239.
Selvan SP, Jebanesan A, Reetha D. Entomofauna diversity of tree hole mosquitoes in Western and Eastern Ghats hill ranges of Tamil Nadu, India. Acta Tropica. 2016; 159: 69-82.
Selvan P S, Jebanesan A and Divya G, Breeding of Aedes aegypti (L.) and its Impact on Dengue / DHF in Rural Areas of Tamil Nadu, India, In: Proc. of Brain Storming Conference on Dengue Scenario in India, B K Tyagi, Ed, 2013, 1, 132-138.
Arunachalam N, Tewari SC, Thenmozhi V, Rajendran R, Paramasivan R, Manavalan R et al. Natural vertical transmission of dengue viruses by Aedes aegypti in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research., 2008; 127:395-397.
Luz Cuello, Samuel Tennyson and Rajasingh Raveen. Assessment of dengue mosquito breeding sources at Pulicat, Tamil Nadu, India, International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2018; 5(3): 42-50.
Manimegalai K. Studies on the mosquito populations from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2010; 2(6): 961-969.
N.L. Kalra, S.M. Kaul, and R.M. Rastogi. Prevalence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus-Vectors of Dengue and Dengue haemorrhagic fever in North, North-East and Central India, 1997,Dengue Bulletin - Vol 21: 84-92.
Rajesh K, Dhanasekaran D, Tyagi BK. Survey of container breeding mosquito larvae (dengue vector) in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2013; 1:88-91.
Babita Bisht, Roop Kumari, BN Nagpal, Himmat Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, AK Bansal and NR Tuli. Influence of environmental factors on dengue fever in Delhi. International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2019; 6(2): 11-18.
Beserra EB, Fernandes CRM, Silva SAO, Silva LA, Santos JW. Effects of temperature on life cycle, thermal exigency and number of generations per year estimation of Aedes aegypti (Diptera,Culicidae). Iheringia-Serie Zoologia 2009; 99: 142-148. (Portuguese with English abstract).
Sankari T, Hoti SL, Singh TB, Shanmugavel J. Outbreak of dengue virus serotype-2 (DENV-2) of Cambodian origin in Manipur, India - association with meteorological factors. Indian J Med Res. 2012; 136: 649-655.
M.Palaniyandi. The role of Remote Sensing and GIS for spatial prediction of vector-borne diseases transmission: A systematic review, Journal Vector Borne Diseases 49, December 2012, pp. 197-204.
M.Palaniyandi. Land Use/Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection Using Space Borne Data, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1997; 25(I,): 27-33.
M.Palaniyandi. Web mapping GIS: GPS under the GIS umbrella for Aedes species dengue and chikungunya vector mosquito surveillance and control, International Journal of Mosquito Research, 2014; 1 (3): 18-25.
Anita Chakravartia, Rohit Arorab, Christine Luxemburger. Fifty years of dengue in India, Review, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2012; 106 273-282.
M Palaniyandi, PH Anand, R Maniyosai. Climate, landscape and the environments of visceral leishmaniasis transmission in India, using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Geophysics and Remote Sensing, 2014; 3 (3), 1-6.
Juan M. Scavuzzo, Francisco Trucco, Manuel Espinosa, Carolina B. Taurob, Marcelo Abril, Carlos M. Scavuzzo, Alejandro C. Frery. Modeling Dengue Vector Population Using Remotely Sensed Data and Machine Learning, Acta Tropica,2018; 185(185): 167-175.
Sudhakar Reddy C, Chandra Shekhar Jha, P. G. Diwakar, and Vinay Kumar Dadhwal. Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015; 187(12): 1-30.
R. Chandran and P. A. Azeez. Outbreak of dengue in Tamil Nadu, India, 2015; Current Science, 109(1): 171-176.
Parasuraman Basker, and Karumana Kolandaswamy. Study on the Behavior of Dengue Viruses during Outbreaks with Reference to Entomological and Laboratory Surveillance in the Cuddalore, Nagapattinam, and Tirunelveli Districts of Tamil Nadu, India,Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2015; 6(3): 143-158.
Dayaraj Cecilia. Current status of dengue and chikungunya in India, 2014; WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health, 3 (1):22-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maharaj Singh Educational Research Development Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




